There are a number of reasons why SCORM is struggling, but the most significant issue is the lack of adoption by major learning platforms. SCORM 2.0 was released in 2006, and since then only a handful of platforms have adopted it. This is in stark contrast to the widespread use of other standards such as HDS and ALICE.

For many educators, SCORM is no longer the best option. There are a number of newer standards such as ALICE that offer more features and flexibility. Additionally, SCORM 2.0 is no longer supported by the majority of vendors.

If you are using SCORM, there are a few things you can do to ensure its survival. First, make sure you are using the most up-to-date version of SCORM. Second, make sure you are aggressively marketing your platform. Third, make sure you are developing new features that are not available in SCORM 2.0.

If you are not using SCORM, there are still a number of reasons to consider it. First, SCORM is still the most widely used standard for authoring and testing learning content. Second, SCORM is a very flexible standard, which makes it ideal for creating custom learning experiences. Third, SCORM is well-suited for automating testing and evaluation processes.

In short, SCORM is in trouble, but that doesn’t mean it is dead. You can still use SCORM to create high-quality learning content and automate testing and evaluation processes.