Canadian entrepreneur and “Shark Tank” investor Kevin O’Leary has sparked controversy with his stance on “right to disconnect” laws, arguing they are “crazy” and that he would fire employees who fail to respond to his texts and calls outside of work hours.

O’Leary’s comments, made in a recent interview, have ignited debate on the blurred lines between work and personal life in the digital age. He believes these laws, which aim to protect employees’ right to disconnect from work outside of their designated hours, are “unrealistic” in today’s business world.

“If you work for me, you’re on call,” he stated, asserting that the ability to be reached at any time is crucial to success in his industry. O’Leary’s stance highlights a growing conflict between employers who prioritize accessibility and employees who seek to reclaim their personal time.

Critics argue that O’Leary’s position undermines the importance of work-life balance and potentially leads to employee burnout. They point out that a right to disconnect allows individuals to recharge and be more productive when they are at work.

However, supporters of O’Leary’s view suggest that “right to disconnect” laws are overly restrictive and stifle flexibility. They argue that employees should be able to communicate with their employers outside of work if they choose to do so, and that these laws unfairly limit freedom and autonomy.

The debate surrounding “right to disconnect” laws continues to be a contentious issue. O’Leary’s outspoken comments highlight the complexities of navigating work-life balance in an increasingly connected world, prompting a necessary conversation about the responsibilities and expectations of both employers and employees.